If one accepts the doctrine of cause and effect, or karma, then whenever someone does something we label negative can be understood to have come about through a number of factors, and we should also understand that the action will bring future suffering on the actor. Generally the consequences of actions are said to be "bigger" than the act itself, although factors like intensity of intent, and so forth, make a big difference.
If we see someone engaging in something truly horrific and we understand that they are sowing the seeds of their own future torment, then compassion will be naturally present, unless we are psychopaths.
In a situation where someone has harmed us, or those we love, then seeing the perpetrator somehow suffering can bring about a very very limited short term sense of "justice" or similar nonsense. This is natural for deluded beings with attachment and aversion.
There does however seem to be a bit of a gap between a spritiually immature sense of justice and rejoicing in someone elses suffering. Karma is constantly generated and by rejoicing in the suffering of others we are simply setting ourselves up for future suffering.
Rejoicing in the suffering of others, whilst calling it justice, is effectively the same as getting blind drunk to forget your job/marriage or whatever is falling apart. Short term there might be a slight sense of relief, but long term it's just adding to the overall pain.
As Shantideva points out, when someone harms us out of anger and so forth, not only should we try to react with compassion and wisdom, but also use the situation for practice. Without people acting negatively towards us, there is no way we can develop patience.
In the most of the mind training mauals those who harm us are referred varyingly to as "objects of compassion" or "wish-fulfilling jewels" to revered as great teachers.
So a guy who was linked to the killings of thousands of people, directly and indirectly, got killed. Impermanence is reality and we are all going to die soon, what is the point in rejoicing at the death of another being simply for their involvement in killing? Is it going to bring anyone back or somehow stop more killing? No. Are the people currently celebrating this also celebrating the death of every butcher or factory farm owner?
Osama, as far as I know, was a human being who acted under the influence of the negative emotions, thus perpetuating his own suffering in cyclic existence. My own experience of the negative emotions themselves, and acting under their influence, is one of unhappiness. This is something I don't wish on others and wish them to be free from.
When we are beginning the Mahayana path, it's taught that we should make XBOXHUGE aspirations. This means, at least mentally, to take on the suffering of all sentient beings as experienced now, as well as that which is to come from their negative karma.
When the King of Yogis was poisioned he made aspirations that the negative karma the Geshe who poisoned him would ripen in himself alone. This was done out of love, and an understanding of the whole situation, not as part of a messianic piece of spiritual onanism.
When we talk about compassion in a Buddhist context it covers quite a lot of ground. Initially, it means things like wanting the obvious pain beings experience, and the causes of it, to be removed. Later this is expanded to the more subtle, or all-pervasive suffering. When one understands, or even better has some realisation of, Buddhanature, then it all becomes a bit more painful. According to the Buddhanature doctrine, all beings are at all times perfectly enlightened Buddhas and they simply fail to see this as a result of temporary veils. This is tragic beyond compare.
Precious Root Guru, inseperable from the Buddha of the Three Times, Karmapa.
Bless me that upon seeing others engage in negative actions, I may there and then take on the suffering inherent in it, whilst seeing it's empty nature clearly.
About Me
- Karma Phuntsok
- Himalayas
- I study, and try to practice, Vajrayana Buddhism. My main areas of interest are Chod, Kagyu and Nyingma traditions as well as Buddhisms interactions with the West, pop-culture and engaged Buddhism.
No comments:
Post a Comment